TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Finnegan v. Meyer & Sons, Inc.

Peter W. Finnegan v. Meyer & Sons, Inc. Motor Power Equipment Company, Appellant

Finnegan v. Meyer & Sons, Inc., 41 N.W.2d 818 (Minn. 1950)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 17, 1950
Docket
No. 35,132
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
41 N.W.2d 818230 Minn. 5831950 Minn. LEXIS 654

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

This was an action in the district court for breach of warranty in the sale of goods. Defendant, Meyer & Sons, Inc., moved for an order making Motor Power Equipment Company a third-party defendant in the action, granting leave to file and serve a proposed third-party complaint upon said company, and requiring the company to answer the same within a time fixed by the court. The court granted the motion, and defendant Motor Power Equipment Company appealed from the order.

Since the filing of this appeal, we have held that an order denying a motion for the joinder of additional parties, defendant or plaintiff, pursuant to M. S. A. 540.16, as amended by L. 1947, c. 152, is not appealable. Chapman v. Dorsey, 230 Minn. 279 , 41 N. W. (2d) 438 . That decision is controlling here.

Therefore, on our own motion, we dismiss the appeal.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Chapman v. Dorsey, 41 N.W.2d 438 (Minn. 1950) 66

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list