TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Roxy Furniture & Novelty Company, Inc. v. Brand

Roxy Furniture & Novelty Co. v. Brand, 126 S.E.2d 295 (Ga. Ct. App. 1962)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia · State Appellate Courts
Decided
May 23, 1962
Docket
No. 39537
Judges
Nichols, Frankum, Jordan
Citations
126 S.E.2d 295106 Ga. App. 1041962 Ga. App. LEXIS 633

Opinion — Nichols

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

1. “Where a principal advances money to his agent on a drawing account against his commission to be earned as a salesman for selling merchandise, and his commission does not amount to the sum advanced, the employer can not, in the absence of an express or implied agreement, or promise to repay any excess of advances' over the commissions earned, recover such excess from the employee. 2 Am. Jur. 229 ; Richmond Dry Goods Co. v. Wilson, 105 W. Va. 221 ( 141 SE 876 , 57 ALR 31 , 33); 2 CJ 787; 39 CJ 153. And see Fried v. Portis Hat Co., 41 Ga. App. 30 ( 152 SE 151 ).”

*106 Smith v. Franklin Printing Co., 54 Ga. App. 385 (2) ( 187 SE 904 ). See also Valdosta Roofing &c. Co. v. Lawrence, 89 Ga. App. 168 ( 79 SE2d 10 ); and Foster v. Union Central Life Ins. Co., 103 Ga. App. 420 (1) ( 119 SE2d 289 ). The employment contract, dated November 1, 1958, called for advances to be made for a period of ninety days only and of necessity the express agreement to repay any deficiency could apply only to the advances which the employer expressly agreed to make. The petition expressly alleged that the defendant was not “overdrawn” on December 31, 1959, that he began his employment on November 1, 1958, and that the amount sued for accrued during the first ten months of 1960. The petition fails to allege either an express or implied agreement on the part of the defendant to repay any advances made after the first ninety days of employment and the trial court did not err in sustaining the defendant’s general demurrer and dismissing the petition.

2. The remaining assignment of error, that the trial court erred in overruling the plaintiff’s oral motion to strike the defendant’s answer, in view of the above ruling, is nugatory and will not be passed upon.

Judgment affirmed.

Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1963: 21965: 11966: 11967: 11971: 119632026peak 1963 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Agnew v. Cameron247 Cal. App. 2d 619 (1967)
  2. Kennesaw Life & Accident Insurance v. Hendricks132 S.E.2d 152 (Ga. Ct. App. 1963)
  3. Biles v. Home Interiors & Gifts, Inc.143 S.E.2d 566 (Ga. Ct. App. 1965)
  4. Armstrong v. Security Life & Trust Co.132 S.E.2d 798 (Ga. Ct. App. 1963)
  5. Cota v. Alexander180 S.E.2d 293 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971)
  6. Valoco Building Products, Inc. v. Chafee231 A.2d 101 (Conn. App. Ct. 1966)

Most recent

  1. Cota v. Alexander180 S.E.2d 293 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971)
  2. Agnew v. Cameron247 Cal. App. 2d 619 (1967)
  3. Valoco Building Products, Inc. v. Chafee231 A.2d 101 (Conn. App. Ct. 1966)
  4. Biles v. Home Interiors & Gifts, Inc.143 S.E.2d 566 (Ga. Ct. App. 1965)
  5. Armstrong v. Security Life & Trust Co.132 S.E.2d 798 (Ga. Ct. App. 1963)
  6. Kennesaw Life & Accident Insurance v. Hendricks132 S.E.2d 152 (Ga. Ct. App. 1963)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 5

DepthCaseCited by
Richmond Dry Goods Co. v. Wilsfn, 141 S.E. 876 (W. Va. 1928) 25
Fried v. Portis Bros. Hat Co., 152 S.E. 151 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930) 20
Smith v. Franklin Printing Co., 187 S.E. 904 (Ga. Ct. App. 1936) 13
Valdosta Roofing & Supply Co. v. Lawrence, 79 S.E.2d 10 (Ga. Ct. App. 1953) 11
Foster v. Union Cent. Life Ins., 119 S.E.2d 289 (Ga. Ct. App. 1961) 11

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list