Dehler v. Golden Age Retirement, Inc.
DEHLER Et Al. v. GOLDEN AGE RETIREMENT, INC. Et Al.
Opinion
Webb, Judge.
1. "The complaint was in two counts. Since the motion for summary judgment was made as to the whole case, it was not error to deny the motion if there was a genuine issue of fact relating to either count.”
Cato v. English, 228 Ga. 120 (1) ( 184 SE2d 161 ). Accord:
Georgia Ports Authority v. Norair Engineering Corp., 131 Ga. App. 618 ( 206 SE2d 563 ) and cases cited.
2. The complaint here is in three counts (a fourth count was voluntarily dismissed), and the motion for summary judgment was made as to all relief prayed for in the three counts. Since there is at least a genuine issue of material fact as to a portion of the relief sought in Count 3, it was not error to deny the motion.
Judgment affirmed.
Pannell, P. J., and Evans, J., concur.
*323 Ross & Finch, A. Russell Blank, Dean, Setliff & Bowman, William T. Dean, Jr., for appellees.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.