General Motors Corporation v. Friend
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION v. FRIEND Et Al.
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
On further consideration of the record in the present case, this court has reached the conclusion that the application for the writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals was improvidently granted. Accordingly, it is Dismissed.
All the Justices concur, except Almand, P. J., Undercover and Frankum, JJ., who dissent.
Dissent
Almand, Presiding Justice,
dissenting. For the reasons given in the dissenting opinion of Judges Pannell, Quillian and Whitman, I would reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals.
Combined text as published — syllabus, headnotes and all opinions in one document
225 Ga. 290 (1969) 167 S.E.2d 926
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
v.
FRIEND et al.
25053.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Argued February 10, 1969. Decided May 9, 1969. Rehearing Denied May 22, 1969.
Greene, Buckley, DeRieux, Moore & Jones, Ferdinand Buckley, James A. Eichelberger, Ross L. Malone, Otis M. Smith, for appellant.
Alford Wall, John Skinner, Neely, Freeman & Hawkins, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
On further consideration of the record in the present case, this court has reached the conclusion that the application for the writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals was improvidently granted. Accordingly, it is.
Dismissed. All the Justices concur, except Almand, P. J., Undercofler and Frankum, JJ., who dissent.
ALMAND, Presiding Justice, dissenting.
For the reasons given in the dissenting opinion of Judges Pannell, Quillian and Whitman, I would reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.