TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Johnson Products, Inc. v. City Council of Medford

JOHNSON PRODUCTS, INC. v. CITY COUNCIL OF MEDFORD Et Al.

Johnson Prods., Inc. v. City Council of Medford, 392 U.S. 296 (1968)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
June 10, 1968
Docket
No. 1398
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
392 U.S. 296
Cited by 4

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 4 cases

View all citing references →
1972: 11974: 11975: 219722026peak 1975 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Ciszewski v. Industrial Accident Board325 N.E.2d 270 (Mass. 1975)
  2. Bennett v. Board of Aldermen282 N.E.2d 669 (Mass. 1972)
  3. Coulombre v. Board of Registrars of Voters of Worcester326 N.E.2d 360 (Mass. App. Ct. 1975)
  4. Chase v. Board of Selectmen310 N.E.2d 144 (Mass. App. Ct. 1974)

Most recent

  1. Coulombre v. Board of Registrars of Voters of Worcester326 N.E.2d 360 (Mass. App. Ct. 1975)
  2. Ciszewski v. Industrial Accident Board325 N.E.2d 270 (Mass. 1975)
  3. Chase v. Board of Selectmen310 N.E.2d 144 (Mass. App. Ct. 1974)
  4. Bennett v. Board of Aldermen282 N.E.2d 669 (Mass. 1972)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Perla v. New York, 392 U.S. 296 (1968) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list