Mitchem v. Balkcom
MITCHEM v. BALKCOM, Warden
Opinion
Candler, Justice.
In this State the common-law rule that the doctrine of res adjudicata does not extend to the trial of habeas corpus proceedings is not of force and such proceedings are subject to the provisions of Code § 110-501. See Andrews v. Aderhold, 201 Ga. 132 (2) ( 39 SE2d 61 ); and Wells v. *48 Keith, 213 Ga. 858 ( 102 SE2d 533 ). The record in this case conclusively shows that the ground on which the applicant here relied for his release from the penitentiary was adjudicated adversely to him by a judgment rendered in a prior habeas corpus proceeding instituted by him against the respondent. This being true, there is no merit ill the contention that the court erred in sustaining the plea of res adjudicata and remanding him to respondent’s custody.
Submitted May 13, 1963 Decided May 29, 1963.
Sam Johnson, Rene Kemp, for plaintiff in error.
Eugene Cook, Attorney General, Howard P. Wallace, Assistant Attorney General, B. Daniel Dubberly, Jr., Deputy Assistant Attorney General, contra.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.