Dossett v. State
Dossett v. the State
Opinion of the Court
Per curiam.
Appellant was convicted in probate court of driving under the influence of alcohol. He appealed that conviction to superior court, which affirmed. On appeal to the Court of Appeals, appellant argued that the probate court’s judgment was void because there was no written waiver of jury trial. The Court of Appeals held that the issue had been waived by appellant’s failure to raise it in the superior court, and affirmed his conviction. Dossett v. State, 197 Ga. App. 139 (2) ( 398 SE2d 24 ) (1990). We granted certiorari to consider whether the absence from the record of a waiver of jury trial in probate court can be raised in an appellate court if not first raised in superior court.
This case is controlled by Nicholson v. State, 261 Ga. 197 ( 403 SE2d 42 ) (1991). Under the holding of that case, Dossett’s failure to raise in the probate court the issue of the absence of a waiver of jury trial prevents appellate review of the issue. The implication in the Court of Appeals’ opinion in this case that a defendant may preserve this issue by raising it in the superior court is inconsistent with our opinion in Nicholson v. State, and is disapproved.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur, except Smith, P. J., and Benham, J., who dissent.
*363 Decided May 10, 1991 — Reconsideration denied June 26, 1991. Virgil L. Brown & Associates, Bentley C. Adams III, Anne Cobb, for appellant. William G. Hamrick III, District Attorney, for appellee.
Dissent
Benham, Justice,
dissenting.
For the reasons stated in my dissent in Nicholson v. State, 261 Ga. 197 ( 403 SE2d 42 ) (1991), I respectfully dissent to the judgment in this case.
I am authorized to state that Presiding Justice Smith joins in this dissent.
Combined text as published — syllabus, headnotes and all opinions in one document
404 S.E.2d 548 (1991) 261 Ga. 362
DOSSETT
v.
THE STATE.
No. S91G0120.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Decided May 10, 1991.
Virgil L. Brown & Associates, Bentley C. Adams III, Anne Cobb, for appellant.
William G. Hamrick III, District Attorney, for appellee.
OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellant was convicted in probate court of driving under the influence of alcohol. He appealed that conviction to superior court, which affirmed.
On appeal to the Court of Appeals, appellant argued that the probate court's judgment was void because there was no written waiver of jury trial. The Court of Appeals held that the issue had been waived by appellant's failure to raise it in the superior court, and affirmed his conviction. Dossett v. State, 197 Ga. App. 139 (2) ( 398 S.E.2d 24 ) (1990). We granted certiorari to consider whether the absence from the record of a waiver of jury trial in probate court can be raised in an appellate court if not first raised in superior court.
This case is controlled by Nicholson v. State, 261 Ga. 197 ( 403 S.E.2d 42 ) (1991). Under the holding of that case, Dossett's failure to raise in the probate court the issue of the absence of a waiver of jury trial prevents appellate review of the issue. The implication in the Court of Appeals' opinion in this case that a defendant may preserve this issue by raising it in the superior court is inconsistent with our opinion in Nicholson v. State , and is disapproved.
Judgment affirmed.
Benham, Justice, dissenting.
For the reasons stated in my dissent in Nicholson v. State, 261 Ga. 197 ( 403 S.E.2d 42 ) (1991), I respectfully dissent to the judgment in this case.
I am authorized to state that Presiding Justice Smith joins in this dissent.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.