TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Brock v. State

Brock v. the State

Brock v. State, 205 S.E.2d 272 (Ga. 1974)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 4, 1974
Docket
No. 28679
Judges
Undercofler
Citations
205 S.E.2d 272232 Ga. 471974 Ga. LEXIS 854

Opinion — Undercofler

Undercofler, Justice.

Willie Otis Brock was convicted in two counts of armed robbery and sentenced to serve 15 years on each count to run concurrently. He appeals to this court.

Held:

1. The appellant contends that his motion for new trial should have been granted on the general grounds because the verdict was contrary to the weight of the evidence. We have carefully reviewed the evidence in this case and find it sufficient to support the verdict. The defendant was positively identified by the two victims and an eyewitness as one of the persons who committed the robberies.

2. The appellant contends that the court erred in failing to charge the jury on robbery by intimidation since it is a lesser included offense in the offense of armed robbery. We do not agree with this contention of the appellant. Although robbery by intimidation is a lesser included offense in the offense of armed robbery (Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1249, 1298; 1969, p. 810; Code Ann. § 26-1902), *48 there is no evidence of robbery by intimidation in this record and a charge thereon is not required.

Holcomb v. State, 230 Ga. 525 ( 198 SE2d 179 ). Compare Ward v. State,.

231 Ga. 484 ( 202 SE2d 421 ).

Submitted February 25, 1974 Decided April 4, 1974.

Andrew A. Smith, Marvin A. Soskin, for appellant.

Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Raoul Lerow, Morris H. Rosenberg, J. Melvin England, for appellee.

3. The appellant complains of a portion of the purported charge of the trial court but the complained of charge is not contained in the charge of the trial court and the question presented will not be decided.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1975: 11976: 11978: 11980: 11997: 119752026peak 1975 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Smith v. State222 S.E.2d 357 (Ga. 1976)
  2. Clempson v. State241 S.E.2d 495 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)
  3. Lightfoot v. State490 S.E.2d 177 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997)
  4. Kennedy v. State265 S.E.2d 85 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980)
  5. Bixby v. State218 S.E.2d 609 (Ga. 1975)

Most recent

  1. Lightfoot v. State490 S.E.2d 177 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997)
  2. Kennedy v. State265 S.E.2d 85 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980)
  3. Clempson v. State241 S.E.2d 495 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)
  4. Smith v. State222 S.E.2d 357 (Ga. 1976)
  5. Bixby v. State218 S.E.2d 609 (Ga. 1975)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Holcomb v. State, 198 S.E.2d 179 (Ga. 1973) 41
Ward v. State, 202 S.E.2d 421 (Ga. 1973) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list