Family Home Services, Inc. v. Taylor
FAMILY HOME SERVICES, INC. v. TAYLOR Et Al.
Opinion
Banke, Judge.
The plaintiffs sued to recover usurious interest allegedly paid to the defendant. The defendant appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of the plaintiffs contending that it included interest on which the statute of limitation had run.
The note was for the principal sum of $5,692 and called for repayment of a total of $12,354 in monthly installments, all of which had been paid prior to the *387 initiation of this suit. A total of $2,677 was repaid in the twelve months immediately preceding the filing of the suit. The judgment was limited to this amount, one year being the statute of limitation applicable to a claim to recover usurious interest payments. Code § 57-115 (Ga. L. 1875, p. 105);
Camp Lumber Co. v. Citizens Bank, 142 Ga. 84, 90 ( 82 SE 492 ) (1914). The defendant contends, however, that only a portion of this total is properly allocable to interest, the remainder being payments on principal and, therefore, not recoverable. Code § 57-112 (Ga. L. 1916, p. 48). This contention is without merit. Since the interest was usurious, it was forfeited. Code Ann. § 57-112, supra. Therefore, all money shown to have been paid in excess of the principal amount of the loan and not barred by the statute of limitation is recoverable.
Hartsfield Co. v. Willis, 192 Ga. 219 (1) ( 14 SE2d 735 ) (1941).
Argued May 9, 1977 Decided May 25, 1977.
Richard L. Parker, for appellant.
Sidney L. Moore, Jr., for appellees.
Judgment affirmed.
Quillian, P. J., and Shulman, J., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.