Lopez-Ortiz v. United States

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

• (stating that “errors resulting from a denial of the right of allocation under Rule 32 are subject to plain error review under Rule 52”)

  United States v. Magwood, 445 F.3d 826 (5th Cir. 2006)

• (presuming that denial of defendant's right to allocution caused prejudice, because of the nature of the right and the difficulty of proving the violation affected a specific sentence)

  United States v. Rodriguez, 406 F.3d 1261 (11th Cir. 2005)

• U.S. Courts of Appeals20
• Federal District Courts2
• State Highest Courts1
• State Appellate Courts1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1