Boone v. Boone

Doris Lovelace Boone, Mary Atkins Lovelace and Joe David Lovelace v. Mary Boone

Boone v. Boone, 218 S.E.2d 221 (N.C. Ct. App. 1975)

Court: Court of Appeals of North Carolina · State Appellate Courts
Decided: October 1, 1975
Docket: No. 7517DC419
Judges: Britt, Parker, Clark
Citations: 218 S.E.2d 22127 N.C. App. 1531975 N.C. App. LEXIS 1775

Cited by 8 2 descriptions by later courts

Opinion — Britt

BRITT, Judge.

By her three assignments of error, defendant contends the court erred (1) in declaring Clyde in contempt of court, (2) in concluding that the court had jurisdiction to declare Clyde in contempt, and (3) in ordering a copy of the order forwarded to the Department of Correction and the Parole Commission if Clyde failed to purge himself of contempt within 30- days of the order.

We do not reach the questions raised by the assignments of error for the reason that defendant has no standing-to raise the questions. It is- well settled in this jurisdiction that -only the party ■ aggrieved may appeal to the appellate court. G.S. 1-271 ;

Coburn v. Roanoke Land and Timber Corporation, 260 N.C. 173 , 132 S.E. 2d 340 (1963);

Watkins v. Grier, 224 N.C. 334 , 30 S.E. 2d 219 (1944) ;

Duke Power Company v. Board of Adjustment, 20 N.C. App. 730 , 202 S.E. 2d 607 (1974)

; cert. denied, 285 N.C. 235 , 204 S.E. 2d 22 (1974). Where a party, is not aggrieved by the judicial order entered, his appeal will be dismissed.

Gaskins v. Fertilizer Company, 260 N.C. 191 , 132 S.E. 2d 345 (1963).

For the reasons stated, the appeal is Dismissed.

Judges Parker and Clark concur.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

("We do not reach the questions raised by the assignments of error for the reason that defendant has no standing to raise the questions.")

The Cherry Cmty. Org. v. The City of Charlotte, 809 S.E.2d 397 (N.C. Ct. App. 2018)

Cited by 8 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Goodson v. Goodson231 S.E.2d 178 (N.C. Ct. App. 1977)
Merritt v. Merritt586 P.2d 550 (Wyo. 1978)
Carawan v. Tate280 S.E.2d 528 (N.C. Ct. App. 1981)
Hoisington v. ZT-Winston-Salem Associates516 S.E.2d 176 (N.C. Ct. App. 1999)
Jefferys v. Tolin368 S.E.2d 201 (N.C. Ct. App. 1988)
Rheinberg-Kellerei GMBH v. Vineyard Wine Co.281 S.E.2d 425 (N.C. Ct. App. 1981)

Most recent

The Cherry Cmty. Org. v. The City of Charlotte809 S.E.2d 397 (N.C. Ct. App. 2018)
The Cherry Cmty. Org. v. The City of Charlotte808 S.E.2d 468 (N.C. Ct. App. 2017)
Hoisington v. ZT-Winston-Salem Associates516 S.E.2d 176 (N.C. Ct. App. 1999)
Jefferys v. Tolin368 S.E.2d 201 (N.C. Ct. App. 1988)
Rheinberg-Kellerei GMBH v. Vineyard Wine Co.281 S.E.2d 425 (N.C. Ct. App. 1981)
Carawan v. Tate280 S.E.2d 528 (N.C. Ct. App. 1981)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

Depth	Case	Cited by
	Coburn v. Roanoke Land & Timber Corp., 132 S.E.2d 340 (N.C. 1963)	18
	Gaskins v. Blount Fertilizer Co., 132 S.E.2d 345 (N.C. 1963)	10
	Watkins v. Grier, 30 S.E.2d 219 (N.C. 1944)	9
	Duke Power Co. v. Salisbury Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, 202 S.E.2d 607 (N.C. Ct. App. 1974)	8

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list