Grajales v. Commonwealth
Omar S. Grajales v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Opinion
Opinion Per Curiam By an unpublished memorandum opinion, a unanimous panel of this Court reversed and dismissed the conviction of Grajales.
1
The Commonwealth requested a rehearing en banc.
Code § 17-116.02(D) provides, in pertinent part, the following:
The Court of Appeals shall sit en banc (i) when there is a dissent in the panel to which the case was originally assigned and an aggrieved party requests an en banc hearing and at least two other judges of the court vote in favor of such a hearing, or (ii) when any judge of any panel shall certify that in his opinion a decision of such panel of the Court is in conflict with a prior decision of the Court or of any panel thereof and two other judges of the Court concur in that view.
There was neither a dissent in the panel nor a certification that the decision conflicted with a prior decision of the Court. We conclude, therefore, that neither requirement for an en banc hearing has been satisfied. Accordingly, the application for a rehearing en banc is denied.
Denied.
Koontz, C.J., Baker, J., Barrow, J., Benton, J., Cole, J., Coleman, J., Duff, J., Hodges, J., Keenan, J., and Moon, J., concurred.
1
Unpublished memorandum opinions of this Court are not to be cited or relied upon as precedent except for the purpose of establishing res judicata, estoppel or the law of the case.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(unpublished memorandum opinions are not to be cited or relied upon as precedent except for the purpose of establishing res judicata, estoppel or the law of the case)
Cited by 25 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
- Kenyatta Ferrell Jones v. Commonwealth of Virginia
- Edward Leonard Christian, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia
- Timothy M. Barrett v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Social Services, etc.
- Timothy M. Barrett v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Social Services, etc.
- Diane Spreadbury v. Peter E. Spreadbury
- McMillan v. Commonwealth
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.