TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Patterson v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

Patterson v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Et Al.

Patterson v. Dretke, Dir., Tex. Dep't of Criminal Justice, Corr. Institutions Div., 543 U.S. 998 (2004)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
November 29, 2004
Docket
No. 04-6249
Citations
543 U.S. 998125 S. Ct. 644160 L. Ed. 2d 45673 U.S.L.W. 33212004 U.S. LEXIS 7685

Opinion

C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ante, p. 921] denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

  • (holding that the Fifth Amendment does not require the government to charge non-statutory aggravating factors in the indictment because "[t]he finding of a non-statutory aggravated alone will not support imposition of the death penalty.'')

Cited by 26 cases

View all citing references →
2005: 152006: 32007: 12008: 32009: 12010: 12011: 12016: 120052026peak 2005 · 15

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Collins10 A.3d 1005 (Conn. 2011)
  2. United States v. Timothy W429 F.3d 835 (9th Cir. 2005)
  3. United States v. Higgs193 F. Supp. 3d 495 (D. Maryland 2016)
  4. United States v. Anthony Gerald White, Sr.405 F.3d 208 (4th Cir. 2005)
  5. State v. Allen615 S.E.2d 256 (N.C. 2005)
  6. United States v. Fell531 F.3d 197 (2d Cir. 2008)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Higgs193 F. Supp. 3d 495 (D. Maryland 2016)
  2. State v. Collins10 A.3d 1005 (Conn. 2011)
  3. Higgs v. United States711 F. Supp. 2d 479 (D. Maryland 2010)
  4. United States v. Taylor635 F. Supp. 2d 1236 (D.N.M. 2009)
  5. Gentry v. Sinclair576 F. Supp. 2d 1130 (W.D. Wash. 2008)
  6. United States v. Fell531 F.3d 197 (2d Cir. 2008)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list