Paris v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co
Paris v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co, 543 U.S. 1005 (2004)
Opinion
PARIS v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO.
No. 04-5703.
Supreme Court of United States.
November 29, 2004.
1
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 94 Fed. Appx. 810 .
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(holding that Key would not have been entitled to relief on his claim that § 13A-5^40(a)(17)
-
(“ ‘ “[T]he prosecutor, as well as defense counsel, has a right to present his impressions from the evidence, if reasonable, and may argue every legitimate inference.’” Reeves v. State, 807 So.2d 18, 45 (Ala.Crim.App.2000), quoting Rutledge v. State, 523 So.2d 1087, 1100 (Ala.Crim.App.1987)
-
(" ' “[T]estimony that may be inadmissible may be rendered harmless by prior or subsequent lawful testimony to the same effect or from which the same facts can be inferred.” ’ See also Dawson v. State, 675 So.2d 897, 900 (Ala.Crim.App.1995), affirmed, 675 So.2d 905 (Ala.1996)
Cited by 23 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.