TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State ex rel. Sprague, Co. v. One Pin Ball MacHine Styled" Nevada"

STATE Ex Rel. SPRAGUE, Co. Atty., v. ONE PIN BALL MACHINE STYLED “NEVADA” Et Al.

State ex rel. Sprague, Co. v. One Pin Ball MacHine Styled" Nev.", 1950 OK 312, 225 P.2d 369
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 12, 1950
Docket
No. 34205
Judges
Davison, Arnold, Corn, Gibson, Luttrell, Halley, Johnson, O'Neal
Citations
225 P.2d 3691950 OK 312203 Okla. 6521950 Okla. LEXIS 541

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

I. C. Sprague, county attorney, as relator, brought a proceeding in the name of the State of Oklahoma to confiscate a pin ball machine styled “Nevada”.

Buck Graves, Ben Williams, and the owner or owners of the pin ball machine were notified of the application to confiscate and Buck Graves filed an answer claiming ownership of the machine.

Following a proceeding to determine the issue involved, the trial judge entered an order denying confiscation and further ordering delivery of the possession of said pin ball machine styled “Nevada” to Buck Graves, intervener.

The relator has duly perfected the appeal and, on December 7, 1949, filed a brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably support the allegations of error. Intervener, Buck Graves, has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, as stated in Gooldy v. Hines, 186 Okla. 583 , 99 P. 2d 498 , it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court *653 but the cause will be reversed and remanded with directions.

The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to the trial court to vacate its order in favor of intervener, Buck Graves, and to enter a judgment of confiscation in accordance with the prayer of the petition in error.

DAVISON, C.J., ARNOLD, V.C.J., and CORN, GIBSON, LUTTRELL, HALLEY, JOHNSON, and O’NEAL, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1950: 51970: 119502026peak 1950 · 5

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Gooldy v. Hines, 1940 OK 93, 99 P.2d 498 18

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list