TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Brown v. General Aniline and Film Corp.

Eloise Brown, Petitioner-Respondent, v. General Aniline and Film Corporation, Respondent-Appellant

Brown v. Gen. Aniline & Film Corp., 325 A.2d 689 (N.J. 1974)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 8, 1974
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
325 A.2d 68965 N.J. 5551974 N.J. LEXIS 200

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes, Justices Hall, Sullivan, P ashman and Clifford, and Judge Kolovsky— 6.

For reversal — Hone.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1980: 11981: 11995: 11999: 119802026peak 1980 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Kibble v. Weeks Dredging & Construction Co.735 A.2d 1142 (N.J. 1999)
  2. Buchanan v. Kerr-McGee Corp.908 P.2d 242 (N.M. Ct. App. 1995)
  3. Alfone v. Sarno432 A.2d 857 (N.J. 1981)
  4. Adams v. Woodbridge Sanitary Pottery Corp.416 A.2d 422 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1980)

Most recent

  1. Kibble v. Weeks Dredging & Construction Co.735 A.2d 1142 (N.J. 1999)
  2. Buchanan v. Kerr-McGee Corp.908 P.2d 242 (N.M. Ct. App. 1995)
  3. Alfone v. Sarno432 A.2d 857 (N.J. 1981)
  4. Adams v. Woodbridge Sanitary Pottery Corp.416 A.2d 422 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1980)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list