TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Pa. Indus. Energy Coalition v. Pa. Puc

Pa. Indus. Energy Coal. v. Pa. Puc, 670 A.2d 1152 (Pa. 1996)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 13, 1996
Judges
Nix, C.J., and Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille and Nigro
Citations
670 A.2d 1152543 Pa. 307

Opinion

543 Pa. 307 (1996) 670 A.2d 1152

PENNSYLVANIA INDUSTRIAL ENERGY COALITION

v.

PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Duquesne Light Company, Pennsylvania Power Company, Metropolitan Edison Company, Pennsylvania Electric Company, Citizens Action Coalition, Office of Consumer Advocate, West Penn Power Company, Philadelphia Electric Company, Sierra Club and Delaware Valley Citizens Council for Clean Air (the Environmentalists), Pennsylvania Power and Light Company, Pennsylvania Gas Association, Allegheny Ludlum Corporation, Peco Energy Company, Intervenors.

Appeal of PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued January 25, 1996. Decided February 13, 1996.

Kevin J. Moody, for Public Utility Com'n.

Alan J. Barak, Harrisburg, for The Environmentalists, Intervenor.

David M. Kleppinger, Harrisburg, Derrick P. Williamson, Harrisburg, for P.I.E. Coalition.

Jeffrey A. Franklin, Reading, for MET-ED, Intervenor.

Lauren S. McAndrews, Pittsburgh, for Allegheny Ludlum Corp., Intervenor.

Tanya J. McCloskey, Harrisburg, for Office of Consumer Advocate, Intervenor.

*308 Dann Regan, Harrisburg, for PGA — Intervenor.

Andre C. Dasent, Philadelphia, for Citizens Action Coalition, Intervenor.

Ward L. Smith, Philadelphia, for PECO, Intervenor.

John L. Munsch, Greensburg, for West Power, Intervenor.

Stephen L. Feld, New Castle, for PA Power, Intervenor.

Before NIX, C.J., and FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE and NIGRO, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Based on its opinion, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed.

NEWMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list