Gold v. TOWN OF EAST HADDAM
Leo Gold Et Al. v. Town of East Haddam
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 103 Conn. App. 369 (AC 27952), is granted, limited to the following issues:
*902 Decided December 14, 2007 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18067.
John S. Bennet, in support of the petition.
Leo Gold, in opposition.
“1. Did the Appellate Court err in its finding that the intent of the voters is a question of fact rather than a question of law to be determined by the language approved by the voters in a town meeting?
“2. Did the Appellate Court err in failing to find that uses which are incidental and secondary to the primary public school purpose do not require the taking to occur within six months of the referendum vote?”
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.