TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF EASTERN UNION CTY. v. Leone

Chamber of Commerce of Eastern Union CTY. v. Leone, 382 A.2d 381 (N.J. 1978)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 27, 1978
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
382 A.2d 38175 N.J. 3191978 N.J. LEXIS 135

Opinion — Per Curiam

75 N.J. 319 (1978) 382 A.2d 381

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF EASTERN UNION COUNTY, A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; THE ELIZABETH DAILY JOURNAL, A DIVISION OF MID-ATLANTIC NEWSPAPERS, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; C. THOMAS THOMAS: JAMES M. McGOWAN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS-CROSS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

RICHARD LEONE, TREASURER OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; BRENDAN BYRNE, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; F. JOSEPH CARRAGHER, ACTING SECRETARY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY: S. HOWARD WOODSON, SPEAKER OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY; FRANK J. DODD, PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS-CROSS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 29, 1977. Decided January 27, 1978.

Mr. John M. Boyle argued the cause for appellants ( Messrs. Sauer, Boyle, Dwyer and Canellis, attorneys; Mr. Boyle and Mr. William A. Cambria, on the brief).

Mr. Lawrence J. Marinari argued the cause for cross-appellants S. Howard Woodson and the New Jersey General Assembly ( Messrs. Stockman, Marinari, Smithson and O'Donnell, attorneys; Ms. Maria Marinari Sypek, on the brief).

Mr. John P. Nulty argued the cause for cross-appellants Frank J. Dodd and the New Jersey State Senate ( Messrs. Nulty and Hayden, attorneys).

Mr. Theodore A. Winard, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents ( Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

*320 PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Chancery Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER and HANDLER — 7.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1981: 11994: 119812026peak 1981 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State ex rel. Udall v. Public Employees Retirement Board882 P.2d 548 (N.M. Ct. App. 1994)
  2. Masse v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, PUB. EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYS.432 A.2d 1339 (N.J. 1981)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list