Clay v. Roper, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center

Clay v. Roper, 544 U.S. 1035 (2005)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: May 16, 2005
Docket: No. 04-8018
Citations: 544 U.S. 1035125 S. Ct. 2246161 L. Ed. 2d 106373 U.S.L.W. 36722005 U.S. LEXIS 3998

Cited by 116 2 descriptions by later courts Original from court

Opinion

544 U.S. 1035

CLAY v. ROPER, SUPERINTENDENT, POTOSI CORRECTIONAL CENTER.

No. 04-8018.

Supreme Court of United States.

May 16, 2005.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 367 F. 3d 993 .

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(explaining that we “consider only whether there is substantial evidence for the findings made by the BIA, not whether there is substantial evidence for some other finding that could have been ... made”)

Shenoda v. U.S. Attorney Gen., 157 F. App'x 130 (11th Cir. 2005)
(conviction not proved by clear and convincing evidence)

Dung Tri Vo v. Gonzales, 482 F.3d 363 (5th Cir. 2007)

Cited by 116 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Liana Tan v. U.S. Attorney General446 F.3d 1369 (11th Cir. 2006)
Jaime Ruiz v. U.S. Attorney General440 F.3d 1247 (11th Cir. 2006)
Baswell Francis v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States442 F.3d 131 (2d Cir. 2006)
Gentry v. Sinclair576 F. Supp. 2d 1130 (W.D. Wash. 2008)
Diego Del Castillo-Restrepo v. U.S. Atty. Gen.148 F. App'x 876 (11th Cir. 2005)
Roberto Federico Segura v. U.S. Attorney General240 F. App'x 347 (11th Cir. 2007)

Most recent

Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security11 F. Supp. 3d 1154 (M.D. Fla. 2014)
Antonia Largaespada v. U.S. Attorney General505 F. App'x 846 (11th Cir. 2013)
BARCO v. Tilton694 F. Supp. 2d 1122 (C.D. Cal. 2010)
United States v. Bolden545 F.3d 609 (8th Cir. 2008)
Gentry v. Sinclair576 F. Supp. 2d 1130 (W.D. Wash. 2008)
Nsou Azondega v. U.S. Attorney General243 F. App'x 554 (11th Cir. 2007)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

Depth	Case	Cited by
	Clay v. Bowersox, 367 F.3d 993 (8th Cir. 2004)	29

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list