TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

McGhee v. McAllister

Jack E. McGHEE, Plaintiff in Error, v. Ann McALLISTER, Defendant in Error

McGhee v. McAllister, 1970 OK 152, 474 P.2d 940
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 28, 1970
Docket
No. 42259
Judges
Hodges
Citations
474 P.2d 9401970 OK 1521970 Okla. LEXIS 431

Opinion — Hodges

HODGES, Justice.

Plaintiff in error filed this appeal on the original record in accordance with Title 12 O.S. Section 956.3, alleging error of the lower court in overruling his motion to require defendant in error to file a release and satisfaction of judgment and motion for new trial. Order and judgment of trial court is affirmed.

Parties will be referred to as they appeared in the lower court, plaintiff in error as defendant and defendant in error as plaintiff.

Plaintiff filed her petition seeking dissolution of partnership, an accounting and damages. A default judgment was entered awarding plaintiff certain real estate and $11,000 in damages. This judgment was appealed from and has now become final. Plaintiff has attempted to satisfy this judgment, and defendant complains that certain property was taken from him and sold improperly. He alleges that real and personal property taken from him to satisfy the judgment was not appraised, advertised, or notice of sale given, in accordance with statutes of the State of Oklahoma. Further, that the property taken from him to satisfy this judgment was of much greater value than has been credited toward satisfaction of the judgment.

The order of the lower court from which defendant appeals recites that evidence was taken and argument heard and in accordance therewith the motion of the defendant was overruled.

The defendant has appealed on the original record, which does not contain a transcript of any evidence taken or admitted. We do not have before us any evidence or testimony upon which to determine the merits of defendant’s assignments of error. In considering issues presented on appeal the Supreme Court is confined to the record. Ajax Contractors, Inc. v. Myatt, Okl., 424 P.2d 30 . We will not consider on appeal matters not contained in the record.

The original record as presented to us on appeal shows no error of the trial court. The order and judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

All Justices concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 11 cases

View all citing references →
1974: 11979: 11981: 11985: 11986: 21988: 22003: 12004: 219742026peak 1986 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Little2004 OK 74, 100 P.3d 707
  2. McCathern v. City of Oklahoma City2004 OK 61, 95 P.3d 1090
  3. Brennen v. Aston2003 OK 91, 84 P.3d 99
  4. Frey v. Independence Fire & Casualty Co.1985 OK 25, 698 P.2d 17
  5. Silk v. Phillips Petroleum Co.1988 OK 93, 760 P.2d 174
  6. Northrip v. Montgomery Ward & Co.1974 OK 142, 529 P.2d 489

Most recent

  1. State ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Little2004 OK 74, 100 P.3d 707
  2. McCathern v. City of Oklahoma City2004 OK 61, 95 P.3d 1090
  3. Brennen v. Aston2003 OK 91, 84 P.3d 99
  4. Mitchell v. Meachum1988 OK 131, 770 P.2d 887
  5. Silk v. Phillips Petroleum Co.1988 OK 93, 760 P.2d 174
  6. Goyne v. Almanza1986 OK 69, 733 P.2d 391

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Ajax Contractors, Inc. v. Myatt, 1967 OK 19, 424 P.2d 30 20

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list