Toledo-Flores v. United States

Toledo-Flores v. United States, 549 U.S. 69 (2006)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: December 5, 2006
Docket: No. 05-7664
Judges: Per Curiam
Citations: 549 U.S. 69127 S. Ct. 638166 L. Ed. 2d 48175 U.S.L.W. 33112006 U.S. LEXIS 9441

Cited by 5 Original from court

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

It is so ordered.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 5 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

United States v. Figueroa-Ocampo494 F.3d 1211 (9th Cir. 2007)
Escobar v. Attorney General221 F. App'x 85 (3d Cir. 2007)
United States v. Estrada-Mendoza475 F.3d 258 (5th Cir. 2007)
United States v. Figueroa-OcampoNo. 05-50777 (9th Cir. July 23, 2007)
Personal Restraint Petition Of Vincent L FowlerNo. 51029-4 (Wash. Ct. App. June 15, 2021)

Most recent

Personal Restraint Petition Of Vincent L FowlerNo. 51029-4 (Wash. Ct. App. June 15, 2021)
United States v. Figueroa-Ocampo494 F.3d 1211 (9th Cir. 2007)
United States v. Figueroa-OcampoNo. 05-50777 (9th Cir. July 23, 2007)
Escobar v. Attorney General221 F. App'x 85 (3d Cir. 2007)
United States v. Estrada-Mendoza475 F.3d 258 (5th Cir. 2007)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

Depth	Case	Cited by
	BP Am. Prod. Co. ex rel. Amoco Prod. Co. v. Burton, 549 U.S. 84 (2006)	167

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list