Stroup v. Willcox
STROUP, DIRECTOR, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY, Et Al. v. WILLCOX Et Al.
Opinion
Chief Justice Roberts, Circuit Justice.
The State of South Carolina and Rodger Stroup, the director of the State’s Department of Archives and History, apply for a stay of the judgment issued by the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit pending the filing and disposition of a petition for writ of certiorari in this Court. Their request fails to meet our standard for such relief. See Barnes v. E-Systems, Inc. Group Hospital Medical & Surgical Ins. Plan, 501 U. S. 1301, 1302 (1991) (Scalia, J., in chambers).
Moreover, a request for extraordinary equitable relief is certainly undermined when the central argument pressed was only mentioned by applicants in passing in the court below. Applicants’ request is based almost exclusively on the Court of Appeals’ failure to certify to the Supreme Court of South Carolina contested questions of state property law. In their initial submission to the Court of Appeals, however, applicants requested that the court rule on the merits of the matter. They merely noted that certification “is an option *1154 for [the] Court if it wants guidance from the South Carolina Supreme Court.” Brief for Appellants in No. 06-1179 (CA4), p. 37, n. 9.
Accordingly, the request for a stay is denied.
It is so ordered.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.