Shy v. State
William H. SHY, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Opinion
ORDER PER CURIAM.
William Shy appeals the judgment denying his motion under Rule 29.15 after an evidentiary hearing.
1
The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).
1
. Shy’s conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute was affirmed in State v. Shy, 52 S.W.3d 585 (Mo.App. E.D.2001).
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.