State v. Bletsch
State of Connecticut v. Jimmie R. Bletsch
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn. App. 186 (AC 24260), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for exemption from the sex offender registry?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant’s convictions for sexual assault in the second degree and risk of injury to a child did not constitute double jeopardy?”
*919 Decided January 20, 2005 Eileen F. McCarthy, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.