Commonwealth v. Presbury
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Alan PRESBURY, Appellant
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM:
Appellant, Alan Presbury, was convicted by a jury of murder in the first degree and sentenced to life imprisonment. Post-verdict motions were denied and this appeal followed.
*49 Appellant contends (1) that the prosecutor made remarks in his opening statement which were not substantiated by the evidence, (2) that the prosecutor made prejudicial remarks in his closing address to the jury, and (3) that the prosecutor unnecessarily cross-examined the appellant concerning prior inconsistent statements. These issues were not raised in the trial court and have therefore not been preserved for appellate review.
Commonwealth v. Clair, 458 Pa. 418 , 326 A.2d 272 (1974); Rule 1119 Pa.R.Cr.P.
Appellant also contends that the prosecutor improperly was permitted to cross-examine an alibi witness about that witness’ refusal to be interviewed by the prosecutor. We have examined this issue and find it to be without merit.
Judgment affirmed.
JONES, Former C. J., and NIX, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.