TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

William Berland Realty Co. v. Hahne & Co.

William Berland Realty Co. v. Hahne & Co., 102 A.2d 686 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1954)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · State Appellate Courts
Decided
January 21, 1954
Judges
Judges Jayne, Francis and Clapp
Citations
102 A.2d 68629 N.J. Super. 3161954 N.J. Super. LEXIS 700

Opinion

29 N.J. Super. 316 (1954) 102 A.2d 686

WILLIAM BERLAND REALTY CO., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

HAHNE & CO., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND CROSS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 4, 1954. Decided January 21, 1954.

Before Judges JAYNE, FRANCIS and CLAPP.

*317 Mr. Herbert J. Hannoch argued the cause for appellants and cross-respondents ( Messrs. Hannoch, Lasser, Weinstein & Myers, attorneys).

Mr. Vincent P. Biunno argued the cause for respondents and cross-appellants ( Messrs. Lum, Fairlie & Foster, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

The judgment with the following modification is affirmed for the reasons expressed by Judge Speakman whose opinion is reported at 26 N.J. Super. 477 ( Ch. Div. 1953). Our review guides us to the conclusion that the extraordinary relief granted by paragraph No. 3 of the judgment wherein the defendants, their respective officers, agents and attorneys are permanently restrained and enjoined from assigning the tenant's interest or any part thereof under the lease, and from subletting the whole or any part of the demised premises during the term of the lease, or any renewal thereof, without the written consent of the plaintiff William Berland Realty Co., or its successors and assigns, was unwarranted by the existing state of the evidence. In that respect only the judgment is reversed and in all other respects it is affirmed. No costs.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 20 cases

View all citing references →
1956: 11958: 11959: 11961: 11963: 11965: 11966: 11967: 11968: 11981: 11982: 31983: 11984: 11986: 11989: 21991: 12017: 119562026peak 1982 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Glenside West Corp. v. Exxon Co., USA761 F. Supp. 1100 (D.N.J. 1991)
  2. Barco Urban Renewal Corp., in No. 81-2082 v. Housing Authority of the City of Atlantic City and Resorts International, Inc674 F.2d 1001 (3d Cir. 1982)
  3. Renee Cleaners, Inc. v. GOOD DEAL, ETC., NJ214 A.2d 437 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1965)
  4. Barco Urban Renewal Corp. v. Housing Authority674 F.2d 1001 (3d Cir. 1982)
  5. Robert L. Ferman & Co. v. General Magnaplate Corp.33 F.R.D. 326 (D.N.J. 1963)
  6. Schultz v. Kneidl153 A.2d 779 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1959)

Most recent

  1. DEBORAH BURKE VS. FRANKE M. DONLON, III(L-0707-14, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)No. A-3802-15T2 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Aug. 11, 2017)
  2. Glenside West Corp. v. Exxon Co., USA761 F. Supp. 1100 (D.N.J. 1991)
  3. Connell Leasing Co. v. JF Equities Acquisition, Inc.731 F. Supp. 1539 (S.D. Fla. 1989)
  4. Mazzeo v. Kartman560 A.2d 733 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1989)
  5. Berkeley Dev. Co. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.518 A.2d 790 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1986)
  6. Village Supermarkets, Inc. v. Township of West Orange6 N.J. Tax 481 (N.J. Tax Ct. 1984)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
William Berland Realty Co. v. Hahne & Co., 98 A.2d 124 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1953) 29

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list