Brooks Clothing of California v. Brooks Brothers
Opinion
158 F.2d 798 (1947)
BROOKS CLOTHING OF CALIFORNIA, Limited, Defendant-Appellant,
v.
BROOKS BROTHERS, Plaintiff-Appellee.
No. 11158.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
January 9, 1947. Rehearing Denied February 10, 1947.
Pacht, Pelton, Warne, Ross & Bernhard, of Los Angeles, Cal. (Isaac Pacht, Clore Warne, and Bernard Reich, all of Los Angeles, Cal., and Harry D. Nims, Minturn de S. Verdi, and Wm. Mitchell Van Winkle, Jr., all of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Beekman Aitken, of New York City (Felix T. Smith, Eugene Prince, and Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, all of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for appellee.
Before GARRECHT, MATHEWS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The opinion of District Judge Leon R. Yankwich ( 60 F.Supp. 442 ) correctly sets forth the salient facts, analyzes the issues, and applies the law. We adopt that opinion as our own. The judgment is affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.