TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. BARNES'ESTATE

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Barnes’ Estate; Same v. Barnes

Comm'r of Internal Revenue v. Barnes'Estate, 30 F.2d 289 (3d Cir. 1929)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 11, 1929
Docket
Nos. 3910, 3911
Judges
Buffington and Davis, Circuit Judges, and Thompson, District Judge
Citations
30 F.2d 2897 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 84341929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2387

Opinion — Buffington

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

The underlying question in these cases is whether a bona fide gift of an interest in a coal-mining company partnership in Pennsylvania was made by their respective husbands to the two women taxpayers. No notice was given to the third partner of the gift, transfer to the women was not registered, and they took no part in the management; they received the profits accruing to them as partners, made income reports accordingly, and paid the tax.

The Commissioner contended thei gifts were not made in good faith and assessed the tax against the husbands. On appeal, the tax board found: “We are convinced that John Barnes, Jr., and Joseph Barnes, in December, 1939, in good faith, intended to give, and did give, to their several wives their several beneficial interests in the partnership of Atherton & Barnes, and that they and their wives thereafter acted upon that basis; heneo there was >2> fraud” — a finding supported by the evidence.

We find the tax board committed no error on holding that the Pennsylvania statutes, viz. the Uniform Partnership Act of March 26, 1935 (Pa. St. 3920, § 16596 et seq.), and the Partnership Registration Act of April 14, 1851 (Pa. St. 1920, §§ 16639, 16640), did not invalidate the gift.

The order of the tax board is therefore affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1930: 21931: 11932: 11934: 11950: 119302026peak 1930 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Champlin v. Commissioner71 F.2d 23 (10th Cir. 1934)
  2. Hanson v. Birmingham92 F. Supp. 33 (N.D. Iowa 1950)
  3. Harris v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue39 F.2d 546 (2d Cir. 1930)
  4. Rossmoore v. Anderson1 F. Supp. 35 (S.D.N.Y. 1932)
  5. Larsen v. Burnet50 F.2d 308 (D.C. Cir. 1930)
  6. Leininger v. Commissioner51 F.2d 7 (6th Cir. 1931)

Most recent

  1. Hanson v. Birmingham92 F. Supp. 33 (N.D. Iowa 1950)
  2. Champlin v. Commissioner71 F.2d 23 (10th Cir. 1934)
  3. Rossmoore v. Anderson1 F. Supp. 35 (S.D.N.Y. 1932)
  4. Leininger v. Commissioner51 F.2d 7 (6th Cir. 1931)
  5. Larsen v. Burnet50 F.2d 308 (D.C. Cir. 1930)
  6. Harris v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue39 F.2d 546 (2d Cir. 1930)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list