Toney v. Schopmeyer

Toney v. Schopmeyer, 146 F.3d 867 (5th Cir. 1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided: May 25, 1998
Docket: No. 97-10881
Citations: 146 F.3d 8671998 U.S. App. LEXIS 21187
Status: Unpublished

Cited by 1 1 descriptions by later courts Original from court

Opinion

146 F.3d 867

Toney v. Schopmeyer *

NO. 97-10881

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 25, 1998

Appeal From: N.D.Tex. ,No.396CV2058P 1

Affirmed.

* Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34-2

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(opining that an allegation that defendants conducted an “illegal search” was conclusional and insufficient)

Nolan v. Buchanan, Officer Zane Crittenden, Officer Luke Price, the Minden Police Dep't, & City Attorney Jimbo Yocom, No. 5:25-cv-01144 (W.D. La. Oct. 6, 2025)

Cited by 1 case

View all citing references →

Federal District Courts1

Relies on it most ⓘ

Antonio Lashun Nolan v. Officer Buchanan, Officer Zane Crittenden, Officer Luke Price, the Minden Police Department, and City Attorney Jimbo YocomNo. 5:25-cv-01144 (W.D. La. Oct. 6, 2025)

Most recent

Antonio Lashun Nolan v. Officer Buchanan, Officer Zane Crittenden, Officer Luke Price, the Minden Police Department, and City Attorney Jimbo YocomNo. 5:25-cv-01144 (W.D. La. Oct. 6, 2025)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list