TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lynch v. State

Billy Lynch v. State

Lynch v. State, 263 S.W.2d 158 (Tex. Crim. App. 1953)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 16, 1953
Docket
No. 26636
Judges
Belcher
Citations
263 S.W.2d 158159 Tex. Crim. 2671953 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1868

Opinion — Belcher

BELCHER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of burglary; his punishment was assessed at a term of five years; and the execution of the sentence was suspended in accordance with the terms of the Adult Probation Law, Art. 781b, V.A.C.C.P.

This is an appeal from an order revoking such probation.

The record contains no statement of facts.

Appellant complains of the procedure followed in this proceeding and insists that he should have all the rights secured to him by law in this hearing for revocation as the law secured to him upon the main trial.

A proceeding to revoke probation is not a “trial,” as that term is used and contemplated by the Constitution in regard to criminal cases. Wilson v. State, 156 Tex. Cr. R. 228 , 240 S.W. 2d 774 .

The review of the hearing on revocation of probation by this court is limited to a determination of the question of whether the trial judge abused his discretion in revoking the order grant *268 ing probation. Jones v. State (page 24, this volume), 261 S.W. 2d 317 ; Graves v. State, 158 Tex. Cr. Rep. 429, 256 S.W. 2d 576 .

In the absence of a statement of facts in this case, we are unable to determine whether such discretion was abused.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1954: 11956: 11958: 11960: 11967: 11972: 11974: 11985: 119542026peak 1954 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Stratmon v. State333 S.W.2d 135 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960)
  2. Leija v. State320 S.W.2d 3 (Tex. Crim. App. 1958)
  3. Guinn v. State289 S.W.2d 583 (Tex. Crim. App. 1956)
  4. Barrow v. State505 S.W.2d 808 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974)
  5. Ex Parte Howard685 S.W.2d 672 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985) · Concurring in Part, Dissenting in Part
  6. Flournoy v. State481 S.W.2d 898 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972)

Most recent

  1. Ex Parte Howard685 S.W.2d 672 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985) · Concurring in Part, Dissenting in Part
  2. Barrow v. State505 S.W.2d 808 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974)
  3. Flournoy v. State481 S.W.2d 898 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972)
  4. Hoskins v. State425 S.W.2d 825 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967)
  5. Stratmon v. State333 S.W.2d 135 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960)
  6. Leija v. State320 S.W.2d 3 (Tex. Crim. App. 1958)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Wilson v. State, 240 S.W.2d 774 (Tex. Crim. App. 1951) 56
Jones v. State, 261 S.W.2d 317 (Tex. Crim. App. 1953) 24
Graves v. State, 256 S.W.2d 576 (Tex. Crim. App. 1953) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list