TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Gould v. Winokur

Gould v. Winokur, 252 A.2d 157 (N.J. 1969)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 26, 1969
Citations
252 A.2d 15753 N.J. 5821969 N.J. LEXIS 452

Opinion

53 N.J. 582 (1969) 252 A.2d 157

ELMER GOULD, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER,

v.

GERALD WINOKUR, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

March 26, 1969.

Messrs. Balk, Jacobs, Goldberger & Mandell for the petitioner.

Messrs. Lamb, Blake, Hutchinson & Dunne and Mr. H. Curtis Meanor for the respondent.

Denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1971: 11980: 11984: 119712026peak 1971 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Brown v. Racquet Club of Bricktown471 A.2d 25 (N.J. 1984)
  2. Klimko v. Rose422 A.2d 418 (N.J. 1980)
  3. Nopco Chemical Co. v. Blaw-Knox Co.272 A.2d 549 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1971)

Most recent

  1. Brown v. Racquet Club of Bricktown471 A.2d 25 (N.J. 1984)
  2. Klimko v. Rose422 A.2d 418 (N.J. 1980)
  3. Nopco Chemical Co. v. Blaw-Knox Co.272 A.2d 549 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1971)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list