TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hooker v. Hoey

Hooker v. Hoey, 107 F.2d 1016 (2d Cir. 1939)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 20, 1939
Docket
No. 71
Judges
Swan, Chase, and Clark, Circuit Judges
Citations
107 F.2d 101623 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 9361939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2911

Opinion

107 F.2d 1016 (1939)

George W. HOOKER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

James J. HOEY, Collector of the United States Internal Revenue for the Second District of the State of New York, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 71.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

November 20, 1939.

Holt S. McKinney, of New York City, for appellant.

John T. Cahill, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Dolores C. Faconti, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before SWAN, CHASE, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed on opinion below, D. C., 27 F.Supp. 489 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1952: 219522026peak 1952 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Hooker v. Hoey, 27 F. Supp. 489 (S.D.N.Y. 1939) 12

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list