In re Paper City Mill Supply Co.
In Re PAPER CITY MILL SUPPLY CO., Inc. Claim of E. J. KELLER CO. Et Al.
Opinion
MORTON, District Judge.
It is conceded that the bankrupt was insolvent, and the evidence makes clear that it was deeply insolvent, at the times when the goods in question were bought. As persons in charge of a business are presumed to he aware of its financial condition, in a general way, at least, and to intend the necessary consequences of their acts, purchases on credit under such conditions are presumptively fraudulent. This inference may be overcome by evidence which shows that the transactions in question were entered into in good faith by the buyers, .with a real, though illusory, expectation of making payment. In re Siegal Co. (D. C.) 223 F. 368 ; In re Gurvitz (D. C.) 276 F. 931 ; In re Morrill-Mascot Co. (D. C.) 286 F. 449 .
In the present case the learned referee was satisfied by the evidence that Goldberg and Belsky, who were in charge of the bankrupt’s affairs, acted in good faith. Upon such a question the conclusion of the judge, who sees the witnesses and is in the atmosphere of the case; carries great weight. I am not convinced that his decision was clearly wrong, and his orders must be affirmed. I should have reached the same result, perhaps with rather less hesitation, if he had decided the other way.
Orders affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.