TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Kemp v. State

Ralph H. Kemp v. State

Kemp v. State, 261 S.W.2d 573 (Tex. Crim. App. 1953)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 28, 1953
Docket
No. 26535
Judges
Woodley
Citations
261 S.W.2d 573159 Tex. Crim. 1101953 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1799

Opinion — Woodley

WOODLEY, Judge.

Upon a plea of guilty before the court, a jury being waived, appellant was adjudged guilty of the offense of rape.

The judgment alone recites the punishment fixed by the court. It is as follows, . . that he be punished by confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of not less than Five (5) nor more than Ten (10) years.”

Such a judgment is indefinite and uncertain as to the punishment assessed and, there being no verdict, is void under the rule announced in Ex parte Traxler, 147 Tex. Cr. Rep. 661, 184 S.W. 2d 286 ; Edwards v. State, 153 Tex. Cr. Rep. 301, 219 S.W. 2d 1022 ; Ex parte East, 154 Tex. Cr. Rep. 123, 225 S. W. 2d 833 .

The indictment charges the offense of rape and it was to this charge that appellant pleaded guilty and was permitted to waive a jury.

The offense of rape may be punished by death and therefore, under the express provisions of Art. 47 P.C., is a capital felony.

Art. 10(a) V.A.C.C.P. provides for the waiver of a jury only *111 “in a criminal prosecution for any offense classified as a felony less than a capital offense.”

Art. 12 V.A.C.C.P. provides that no person can be convicted of a felony except upon the verdict of a jury duly rendered and recorded unless in felony cases less than capital a jury has been waived as provided in Art. 10(a) V.A.C.C.P.

The conviction without a jury verdict in a capital case, in violation of the statutes mentioned, cannot be upheld.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1955: 21956: 11958: 21959: 11963: 11964: 21984: 119552026peak 1955 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State ex rel. Nicholson v. Boles134 S.E.2d 576 (W. Va. 1964)
  2. Houston v. State287 S.W.2d 643 (Tex. Crim. App. 1956)
  3. Ex Parte Adams383 S.W.2d 596 (Tex. Crim. App. 1964)
  4. Villarreal v. State317 S.W.2d 531 (Tex. Crim. App. 1958)
  5. Clemons v. State676 S.W.2d 356 (Tex. Crim. App. 1984) · Dissent
  6. Benge v. State330 S.W.2d 195 (Tex. Crim. App. 1959)

Most recent

  1. Clemons v. State676 S.W.2d 356 (Tex. Crim. App. 1984) · Dissent
  2. Ex Parte Adams383 S.W.2d 596 (Tex. Crim. App. 1964)
  3. State ex rel. Nicholson v. Boles134 S.E.2d 576 (W. Va. 1964)
  4. Ex parte Sparks372 S.W.2d 697 (Tex. Crim. App. 1963)
  5. Benge v. State330 S.W.2d 195 (Tex. Crim. App. 1959)
  6. Ex parte Donahoo317 S.W.2d 744 (Tex. Crim. App. 1958)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Ex Parte Traxler, 184 S.W.2d 286 (Tex. Crim. App. 1944) 46
Ex Parte East, 225 S.W.2d 833 (Tex. Crim. App. 1950) 26
Edwards v. State, 219 S.W.2d 1022 (Tex. Crim. App. 1949) 14

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list