TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, Et Al., Defendants-Respondents

Pa.-Reading Seashore Lines v. Bd. of Pub. Util. Comm'rs, 83 A.2d 774 (N.J. 1951)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 22, 1951
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
83 A.2d 7748 N.J. 851951 N.J. LEXIS 163
Cited by 7

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Eastwood in the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

For affirmance—Chief- Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Case, Waoheneeld, Burling and Ackerson—5.

For reversal—None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 7 cases

View all citing references →
1954: 11957: 11967: 11973: 21984: 12010: 119542026peak 1973 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services9 A.3d 882 (N.J. 2010)
  2. Bayshore Sew. Co. v. Dep't. of Env., NJ299 A.2d 751 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1973)
  3. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Department of Public Utilities102 A.2d 618 (N.J. 1954)
  4. Cappture Realty Corp. v. BD. OF ADJ. ELMWOOD PK.313 A.2d 624 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1973)
  5. Kessler v. Tarrats476 A.2d 326 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1984)
  6. In re Complaint of Brotherhood of RR Trainmen229 A.2d 505 (N.J. 1967)

Most recent

  1. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services9 A.3d 882 (N.J. 2010)
  2. Kessler v. Tarrats476 A.2d 326 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1984)
  3. Cappture Realty Corp. v. BD. OF ADJ. ELMWOOD PK.313 A.2d 624 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1973)
  4. Bayshore Sew. Co. v. Dep't. of Env., NJ299 A.2d 751 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1973)
  5. In re Complaint of Brotherhood of RR Trainmen229 A.2d 505 (N.J. 1967)
  6. Sayreville v. Pennsylvania RR Co.129 A.2d 895 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1957)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list