TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Delaware Sand & Gravel Co. v. Bryson

DELAWARE SAND & GRAVEL COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Below, Appellant, v. John C. BRYSON, Secretary of the Department of National Resources and Environmental Control of the State of Delaware, Plaintiff-Below, Appellee

Del. Sand & Gravel Co. v. Bryson, 414 A.2d 207 (Del. 1980)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Delaware · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 7, 1980
Judges
Duffy, McNeilly and Horsey
Citations
414 A.2d 2071980 Del. LEXIS 385

Opinion — McNEILLY

McNEILLY, Justice:

This case involves a default judgment entered pursuant to Superior Court Civil Rule 55(b)(1) in favor of the plaintiff, John Bryson as Secretary of the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (the Department), in an action alleging violation of the Department’s solid waste disposal regulations. The defendant, Delaware Sand & Gravel Company, through its attorney, entered a stipulation with the Department extending the defendant’s time to answer the complaint. After the defendant’s failure to file an answer within that time period, the Department procured the entry of the default judgment without prior notification to the defendant of its intentions.

The sole issue we will consider in this appeal is whether the Superior Court erred in denying the defendant’s motion to set aside the default judgment? We conclude that the denial was error and reverse.

The parties had engaged in what the Department concedes was a long series of discussions in this matter for about a year prior to the filing of this action. In addition, after suit was commenced, the attorneys representing the parties engaged in discussions in an effort to reach a settlement. Indeed, one reason for the entrance of the stipulation was an effort to allow sufficient time to reach a settlement.

Under the facts of this case, the stipulation for the extension of time filed with the Court and signed by counsel for the defendant was sufficient to constitute an appearance as contemplated in Superior Court Civil Rule 5(aa)(l). Superior Court Civil Rule 55(b), under which the default was entered, provides in part “when a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is *208 sought, has failed to appear, plead or otherwise defend as provided by these Rules, . judgment by default may be entered as follows . . . ” (emphasis added).

Consequently, an appearance having been made, default judgment under Rule 55(b) was unavailable. Because of our disposition of this issue, we do not reach the other issues raised by the parties.

‡ * ‡ ¡Jt sfc REVERSED and REMANDED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2003: 12004: 12009: 12020: 12022: 12024: 120032026peak 2003 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Sheryl Dickerson v. The Villages of Five Points Property Owners Association, Inc.No. 2020-0420-PWG (Del. Ch. Dec. 9, 2020)
  2. Amoako v. Clayton Police DepartmentNo. K24C-03-026 NEP (Del. Super. Ct. July 31, 2024)
  3. Clinton v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.977 A.2d 892 (Del. 2009)
  4. Pinkett ex rel. Britt v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance832 A.2d 747 (Del. Super. Ct. 2003)
  5. In re the Marriage of Zacher2004 MT 249, 98 P.3d 309
  6. Thompson v. FernbachNo. S20C-08-025 MHC (Del. Super. Ct. Apr. 1, 2022)

Most recent

  1. Amoako v. Clayton Police DepartmentNo. K24C-03-026 NEP (Del. Super. Ct. July 31, 2024)
  2. Thompson v. FernbachNo. S20C-08-025 MHC (Del. Super. Ct. Apr. 1, 2022)
  3. Sheryl Dickerson v. The Villages of Five Points Property Owners Association, Inc.No. 2020-0420-PWG (Del. Ch. Dec. 9, 2020)
  4. Clinton v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.977 A.2d 892 (Del. 2009)
  5. In re the Marriage of Zacher2004 MT 249, 98 P.3d 309
  6. Pinkett ex rel. Britt v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance832 A.2d 747 (Del. Super. Ct. 2003)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list