TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Johore Investment Company (USA) Inc.

In Re JOHORE INVESTMENT COMPANY (U.S.A.) INC., Debtor

In re Johore Inv. Co. (USA), 41 B.R. 318 (Bankr. D. Haw. 1984)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · Bankruptcy Courts
Decided
July 26, 1984
Docket
No. 19-00115
Judges
Jon J. Chinen
Citations
41 B.R. 3181984 Bankr. LEXIS 5319

Opinion — Chinen

ORDER RE: APPLICATION TO EMPLOY SPECIAL COUNSEL FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSE ON A CONTINGENCY FEE BASIS JON J. CHINEN, Bankruptcy Judge.

Johore Investment Company (U.S.A.) Inc., (“Debtor”) requests permission to employ the law offices of Schutter, Pavey, and Cayetano (“SPC”) as special counsel in an action against Territorial Savings and Loan Association (“TSL”), and Territorial Enterprises, Inc. (“TEI”), on a contingency fee basis.

SPC currently represent Mr. Tunku Osman Ahmad in both the First Circuit Court of the State of Hawaii and in the United States District Court of Honolulu for fraud and misrepresentation against TSL and TEI. Mr. Ahmad is the sole shareholder of Toa, Inc., which owns fifty per cent (50%) of the shares of Debtor.

Debtor also intends to sue TSL and TEI for fraud and misrepresentation. In addition, Debtor also has potential claims against Mr. Ahmad. If Debtor had been overcharged and defrauded, it may have claims against any “insiders”, including Mr. Ahmad. Thus, Debtor’s attorney has a duty to investigate the past activities of Debtor which may involve some or all of the “insiders”.

11 U.S.C. § 327 prohibits the employment of any professional person who holds or represents an interest adverse to the estate or one who is not a disinterested person. There is clearly a conflict of interest between Mr. Ahmad and the Debtor.

Thus, the application to employ SPC as special counsel for Debtor on a contingency fee basis is hereby denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1985: 11988: 11990: 11992: 11993: 219852026peak 1993 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Roberts46 B.R. 815 (Bankr. D. Utah 1985)
  2. Colorado National Bank of Denver v. Ginco, Inc. (In re Ginco, Inc.)105 B.R. 620 (D. Colo. 1988)
  3. In re American Avia Associates-SEA150 B.R. 24 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 1992)
  4. In re F & C International, Inc.159 B.R. 220 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1993)
  5. In re Smartt132 B.R. 765 (Bankr.D. Colo. 1990)
  6. In re F & C Intern., Inc.159 B.R. 220 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1993)

Most recent

  1. In re F & C Intern., Inc.159 B.R. 220 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1993)
  2. In re F & C International, Inc.159 B.R. 220 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1993)
  3. In re American Avia Associates-SEA150 B.R. 24 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 1992)
  4. In re Smartt132 B.R. 765 (Bankr.D. Colo. 1990)
  5. Colorado National Bank of Denver v. Ginco, Inc. (In re Ginco, Inc.)105 B.R. 620 (D. Colo. 1988)
  6. In re Roberts46 B.R. 815 (Bankr. D. Utah 1985)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list