TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State ex rel. Cobb v. Bailey

State ex rel. Cobb v. Bailey, 349 So. 2d 849 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida · State Appellate Courts
Decided
September 19, 1977
Docket
No. HH-68
Judges
Smith
Citations
349 So. 2d 849

Opinion

349 So.2d 849 (1977)

STATE of Florida ex rel. Glenwood Brooks COBB, Sr., Relator,

v.

The Honorable W.L. BAILEY, As Circuit Judge of the Fourteenth Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida, Respondent.

No. HH-68.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 19, 1977.

*850 Bill A. Corbin Law Offices, P.A., Blountstown, for relator.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Douglas C. Kearney, and Joseph W. Lawrence, II, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.

SMITH, Judge.

We issued a rule nisi in prohibition on relator's showing that the respondent circuit judge, having recused himself from consideration of the dissolution issues in this case of marital strife, improperly proceeded to hear and determine the wife's motion for contempt process against relator. Respondent has filed a return to the rule and we have considered the case on briefs and a transcript of the circuit court's proceedings. The respondent circuit judge, sensitive to an appearance of impropriety in his consideration of emotional issues between parties with whom the judge had social and business relations for "quite a long time," invited an oral suggestion for recusal, which relator made, and recused himself from consideration of the case. The court reserved power, however, to act immediately on imminent questions of temporary alimony and child support and temporary use and possession of an automobile and household items. While relator acquiesced in the court's retention of limited jurisdiction, relator affirmatively objected when, nearly four weeks later, the respondent judge undertook disposition of the wife's petition that relator be held in contempt for disobedience to the court's order temporarily regulating the parties' property affairs pending a full hearing before another judge.

We consider that the respondent judge's recusal order effectively deprived that judge of authority to preside in the contempt proceedings. In these circumstances, the trial court's order temporarily fixing the parties' obligations pending final hearing may stand, but the wife's petition for contempt proceedings should have been and must now be referred to another circuit judge. A recusal entered on informal motion in lieu of formal disqualification proceedings ends the judge's power to take part in the disposition of the case. Gilmer v. Shell Oil Co., 324 So.2d 171 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). The contempt order is vacated and a writ of prohibition will issue.

MILLS, Acting C.J., and ERVIN, J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1980: 11983: 11984: 12003: 12009: 119802026peak 1980 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Schwartz v. Schwartz431 So. 2d 716 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
  2. Coastal Petroleum Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.378 So. 2d 336 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)
  3. Plaza v. Plaza21 So. 3d 181 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
  4. Southern Coatings, Inc. v. City of Tamarac840 So. 2d 1109 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
  5. Johnson v. District Court In & For the County of Jefferson674 P.2d 952 (Colo. 1984)

Most recent

  1. Plaza v. Plaza21 So. 3d 181 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
  2. Southern Coatings, Inc. v. City of Tamarac840 So. 2d 1109 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
  3. Johnson v. District Court In & For the County of Jefferson674 P.2d 952 (Colo. 1984)
  4. Schwartz v. Schwartz431 So. 2d 716 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
  5. Coastal Petroleum Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.378 So. 2d 336 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Gilmer v. Shell OIL Co., 324 So. 2d 171 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975) 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list