TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Parrish v. State

Parrish v. State, 366 So. 2d 530 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida · State Appellate Courts
Decided
January 23, 1979
Docket
No. 78-1239
Judges
Hendry, Kehoe and Schwartz
Citations
366 So. 2d 530

Opinion

366 So.2d 530 (1979)

Ricky Ellis PARRISH, Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 78-1239.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

January 23, 1979.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Mark King Leban, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Susan Minor, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, KEHOE and SCHWARTZ, JJ.

*531 SCHWARTZ, Judge.

The appellant, who was convicted of burglary, complains of the trial judge's action in declining to eliminate the date and place of taking from the fingerprint standard card introduced into evidence. His theory is that since the date was before the offense involved in the trial, and the place of taking was the police department, the information may have improperly led the jury to believe that the defendant had some prior criminal involvement. Since nothing on the card indicated that this was the case, or that the standards had been taken for any reason other than mere non-criminal identification, it is clear that no error, much less harmful error, has been demonstrated on this point. See Jackson v. State, 328 So.2d 576 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Henderson v. State, 304 So.2d 537 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Jenkins v. State, 208 So.2d 276 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968) cert. denied, 212 So.2d 878 (Fla. 1968); § 924.33, Fla. Stat. (1977).

We likewise reject the defendant's contention that the fingerprint evidence against him was insufficient to sustain his conviction. Roberts v. State, 268 So.2d 578 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972). Therefore, the judgment below is

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1979: 11981: 21983: 21986: 11987: 11992: 11999: 119792026peak 1981 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Maples v. State758 So. 2d 1 (Ala. Crim. App. 1999)
  2. Lewis v. State488 So. 2d 1362 (Ala. Crim. App. 1986)
  3. Woodson v. State405 So. 2d 967 (Ala. Crim. App. 1981)
  4. D.J.C. v. State400 So. 2d 830 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
  5. Durham v. State377 So. 2d 769 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)
  6. Singletary v. State428 So. 2d 355 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Most recent

  1. Maples v. State758 So. 2d 1 (Ala. Crim. App. 1999)
  2. Koffiel v. State609 So. 2d 160 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
  3. Jones v. State505 So. 2d 20 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
  4. Lewis v. State488 So. 2d 1362 (Ala. Crim. App. 1986)
  5. Moore v. State442 So. 2d 230 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
  6. Singletary v. State428 So. 2d 355 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Roberts v. State, 268 So. 2d 578 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972) 11
Henderson v. State, 304 So. 2d 537 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974) 9
Jenkins v. State, 208 So. 2d 276 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968) 5
Jackson v. State, 328 So. 2d 576 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list