TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Velasquez

UNITED STATES of America v. David VELASQUEZ

United States v. Velasquez, 762 F. Supp. 39 (E.D.N.Y. 1991)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court, E.D. New York · Federal District Courts
Decided
April 23, 1991
Docket
No. 89 CR 765
Judges
Weinstein
Citations
762 F. Supp. 391991 WL 653771991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5608

Opinion — Weinstein

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WEINSTEIN, District Judge.

Defendant was arrested in October of 1989. During pre-trial detention, he was diagnosed as having testicular cancer. The affected organs were surgically removed. Thereafter, he received chemotherapy and radiation. In a subsequent examination, multiple pulmonary nodes were discovered, and the attending physician diagnosed a metastatic germ cell tumor.

He pled guilty to conspiring to possess with intent to distribute in excess of 500 grams of cocaine. The object of the conspiracy was to distribute 300 kilograms of cocaine. The guideline range is one hundred and fifty-one to one hundred and eighty-eight months in prison with at least a four year term of supervised release and a fifty dollar special assessment. The statute provides a five year minimum term of imprisonment.

See 21 U.S.C. § 841 (b)(1)(B).

Defendant now moves for a downward departure under Sections 5H1.4 and 5K2.0 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines on the ground that his metastasized cancer is a serious, life-threatening illness, which constitutes an extraordinary physical impairment as that term is defined in the guidelines. The Government agreed at the time of sentencing not to contest a court ruling that defendant’s cancer is a “mitigating circumstance of a kind, or to a degree, not adequately taken into consideration by the Sentencing Commission in formulating the guidelines that should result in a sentence different from that described.” 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (b); U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0;

see United States v. Perez, 756 F.Supp. 698 (E.D.N.Y.1991).

A downward departure without recommendation by the Government (cf.

U.S. S.G. § 5K1.1) is warranted. Defendant is sentenced to the statutory minimum five year term of imprisonment, a five year term of supervised release and a fifty dollar special assessment. Since no recommendation of leniency is made by the Government, a term of imprisonment less than five years is not permissible.

See 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (e).

So ordered.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1993: 11994: 11995: 119932026peak 1993 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Marc David Rabins, United States of America v. A.L. Johnson63 F.3d 721 (8th Cir. 1995) · Dissent
  2. United States of America v. Denny L. Goff6 F.3d 363 (6th Cir. 1993)
  3. United States v. Carlo Streat22 F.3d 109 (6th Cir. 1994)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Marc David Rabins, United States of America v. A.L. Johnson63 F.3d 721 (8th Cir. 1995) · Dissent
  2. United States v. Carlo Streat22 F.3d 109 (6th Cir. 1994)
  3. United States of America v. Denny L. Goff6 F.3d 363 (6th Cir. 1993)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Perez, 756 F. Supp. 698 (E.D.N.Y. 1991) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list