TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Finn v. Finn

Finn v. Finn, 464 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida · State Appellate Courts
Decided
February 26, 1985
Docket
No. 84-698
Judges
Schwartz, C.J., and Barkdull and Hubbart
Citations
464 So. 2d 126610 Fla. L. Weekly 507

Opinion

464 So.2d 1266 (1985)

Dianna Lee FINN, Appellant,

v.

John Aubrey FINN, Appellee.

No. 84-698.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

February 26, 1985. Rehearing Denied April 1, 1985.

*1267 Lisa Bennett, Miami, for appellant.

English, McCaughan & O'Bryan and Robert J. Schaffer, Coral Gables, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal and cross-appeal challenge portions of a judgment concerning the jointly owned marital home rendered after the cause was remanded in Finn v. Finn, 414 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Although the father was again awarded custody of the minor children, he has remarried and, contrary to the order below, is not thereafter entitled to exclusive possession of the home. Schein v. Schein, 448 So.2d 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Abella-Fernandez v. Abella, 393 So.2d 40 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). The property in question is therefore subject to partition upon remand.

The parties have agreed in open court before us that the ex-husband, who has paid the mortgage, repairs and other expenses since the dissolution, should be given credit upon the partition sale for all, including the wife's half, of those amounts. See Iodice v. Scoville, 460 So.2d 576 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). Subsequent to the date of Mr. Finn's remarriage, however, the ex-wife is entitled to a credit of one-half of the reasonable rental value of the home. Adkins v. Edwards, 317 So.2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).

The order under review is vacated and the cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance herewith.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1985: 31986: 11989: 11994: 119852026peak 1985 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Vandergrift v. Buckley472 So. 2d 1325 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
  2. Finn v. Finn493 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
  3. Goolsby v. Wiley547 So. 2d 227 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
  4. Diedricks v. Reinhardt466 So. 2d 375 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
  5. Bailes v. Bailes468 So. 2d 396 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
  6. Barbare v. Napier645 So. 2d 146 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Most recent

  1. Barbare v. Napier645 So. 2d 146 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
  2. Goolsby v. Wiley547 So. 2d 227 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
  3. Finn v. Finn493 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
  4. Vandergrift v. Buckley472 So. 2d 1325 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
  5. Bailes v. Bailes468 So. 2d 396 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
  6. Diedricks v. Reinhardt466 So. 2d 375 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 6

DepthCaseCited by
Adkins v. Edwards, 317 So. 2d 770 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975) 15
Abella-Fernandez v. Abella, 393 So. 2d 40 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981) 14
Iodice v. Scoville, 460 So. 2d 576 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984) 9
Schein v. Schein, 448 So. 2d 16 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984) 8
Finn v. Finn, 414 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982) 1
Dade Athletic Club, Inc. v. Delaney, 464 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list