TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Application for Discipline of Swiggum

In Re Application for Discipline of Henry G. Swiggum

In re Application for Discipline of Swiggum, 125 N.W.2d 169 (Minn. 1963)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 6, 1963
Docket
No. 39,223
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
125 N.W.2d 169267 Minn. 5481963 Minn. LEXIS 796

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

This proceeding was commenced by the State Board of Law Examiners for the disbarment of Henry G. Swiggum, an attorney at law duly licensed to practice in the State of Minnesota, by service of its petition on respondent on August 15, 1963, together with an order of this court requiring respondent to answer the accusations contained therein within 20 days after said service. No answer or other pleading has been filed by respondent, and the time permitted therefor has now expired.

The petition of the State Board of Law Examiners alleges that respondent obtained custody and control of certain sums of money belonging to an estate which as an attorney he was retained to probate and that he wrongfully converted the same to his own use and benefit; that he has failed to account to said estate for said money; that he has drawn excessive and unauthorized and unconscionable attorney’s fees for services alleged to have been rendered on behalf of said estate; and that he has failed to comply with an order of the Probate Court of Hennepin County.

It Is Therefore Ordered, That respondent, Henry G. Swiggum, be and he hereby is disbarred and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys of this state.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1972: 11979: 11982: 11983: 21987: 119722026peak 1983 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re the Discipline of Primus283 N.W.2d 519 (Minn. 1979)
  2. In re Disciplinary Action Against Sampson408 N.W.2d 574 (Minn. 1987)
  3. In re Disciplinary Action Against Austin333 N.W.2d 633 (Minn. 1983)
  4. In re Austin333 N.W.2d 633 (Minn. 1983)
  5. In re Discipline of Fling316 N.W.2d 556 (Minn. 1982)
  6. Application of Herman197 N.W.2d 241 (Minn. 1972)

Most recent

  1. In re Disciplinary Action Against Sampson408 N.W.2d 574 (Minn. 1987)
  2. In re Austin333 N.W.2d 633 (Minn. 1983)
  3. In re Disciplinary Action Against Austin333 N.W.2d 633 (Minn. 1983)
  4. In re Discipline of Fling316 N.W.2d 556 (Minn. 1982)
  5. In re the Discipline of Primus283 N.W.2d 519 (Minn. 1979)
  6. Application of Herman197 N.W.2d 241 (Minn. 1972)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list