Thomas v. State
William E. THOMAS, Jr., Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, Appellee
Opinion
OPINION DALLY, Commissioner.
The conviction is for driving a motor vehicle on a public highway while intoxicated; the punishment, thirty days in jail and a fine of $200.00.
The complaint appearing in the record bears the jurat of the Assistant District Attorney “Sworn to and subscribed before me this 16th day of June, A.D. 1970.”
The complaint alleges that the offense was committed “on or about the 24th day of September, A.D. 1970.”
The information based on the complaint alleges the offense was committed “on or about the 24th day of September, A.D. 1969.”
The date on or about which the offense was alleged to have been committed being subsequent and not anterior to the date the complaint was sworn to renders *237 the complaint fatally defective. Hall v. State, 373 S.W.2d 252 (Tex.Cr.App.1963) and Mitchell v. State, 170 Tex.Cr.R. 255 , 340 S.W.2d 301 (1960).
The variance between the complaint and the information as to the date when the offense was committed is fatal to the validity of the information. Beasley v. State, 397 S.W.2d 454 (Tex.Cr.App.1966) and Wheat v. State, 172 Tex.Cr.R. 259 , 356 S.W.2d 323 (1962) and the cases cited therein.
In the interest of justice the fundamental errors which have been designated above but which were not assigned as grounds of error in a brief filed in the trial court have been considered under the provisions of Art. 40.09, Sec. 13, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.
The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
Opinion approved by the Court.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 8 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.