Gomez v. State
Opinion
621 So.2d 578 (1993)
Eyvor A. GOMEZ, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 92-2519.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 27, 1993.
*579 Kaeiser & Potolsky, Miami, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Linda S. Katz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and COPE, JJ.
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
We entirely agree with the trial court and Freeman v. State, 611 So.2d 1260 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), that no double jeopardy violation is involved in the prosecution of a D.U.I. charge after the defendant's driver's license has been seized, because of the same conduct, by the arresting officer pursuant to section 322.2615, Florida Statutes (1991). See Smith v. City of Gainesville, 93 So.2d 105 (Fla. 1957).
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(no double jeopardy violation was involved in prosecution of DUI charge after defendant’s driver’s license was seized because of same conduct)
Cited by 10 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.