Pecos Valley Southern Railway Co. v. Parkhill Produce Co.
Pecos Valley Southern Railway Company, Petitioner v. Parkhill Produce Company, Respondent
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
We are in agreement with the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case, 348 S.W. 2d 208 , upon the points wherein there is conflict with the 1897 decision of the Galveston Court of Civil Appeals in First National Bank v. East, 43 S.W. 558 . See, Middlebrook v. David Bradley Manufacturing Company, 86 Texas 706 , 26 S.W. 935 ; Warner v. Gohlman, Lester & Co., 117 Texas 145 , 298 S.W. 890 ; Id. Texas Civ. App., 8 S.W. 2d 1049; Stevens v. Willson, 120 Texas 584 , 39 S.W. 2d 1088 ; Shafer v. Brashear, Texas Civ. App., 274 S.W. 229 ; Mutual Federal Savings & Loan Association of El Paso v. Anderson, Texas Civ. App., 88 S.W. 2d 499 ; Wolcott v. Hall, Texas Civ. App., 111 S.W. 2d 1140 ; Dickson v. Klett, Texas Civ. App., 211 S.W. 2d 381 , mand. overr., 1 McDonald, Civil Procedure, 420, Sec. 4.38. In accordance with the provisions of Rule 483, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, the application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error.
Opinion delivered October 18, 1961.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 15 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.