TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Picchione v. Asti

Picchione v. Asti, 354 So. 2d 954 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida · State Appellate Courts
Decided
February 7, 1978
Docket
No. 76-2321
Judges
Pearson, Nathan and Hubbart
Citations
354 So. 2d 954
Cited by 9

Opinion

354 So.2d 954 (1978)

Nicholas PICCHIONE, d/b/a Nicholas Picchione & Co., Appellant,

v.

Robert ASTI, Earl DeMaris and Demetra DeMaris, Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Alfred DeMaris, Deceased, Appellees.

No. 76-2321.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

February 7, 1978.

Sciarretta & Jackvony, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Blackwell, Walker, Gray, Powers, Flick & Hoehl and James E. Tribble, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, NATHAN and HUBBART, JJ.

*955 PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a summary final judgment entered in an action against the estate of Alfred DeMaris upon the basis that the plaintiff was barred from proceeding with the action because of his failure to file a claim in the estate pursuant to Section 733.702, Florida Statutes (1975). The fact of the plaintiff's failure was established on the record. The only suggested issue of fact is that the estate was estopped to assert the statute. See Davis v. Evans, 132 So.2d 476 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961). No reply upon the basis of estoppel was asserted. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.100. Plaintiff produced nothing in opposition to the motion for summary judgment. Therefore, summary judgment was properly entered.

A second point presented by appellant urges the unconstitutionality of Section 733.702, Florida Statutes (1975). The plaintiff did not challenge the constitutionality of the statute in the trial court and, therefore, cannot raise the question for the first time on this appeal. Sanford v. Rubin, 237 So.2d 134 (Fla. 1970). [1]

Affirmed.

NOTES

[1] It is noted that if the constitutionality of the statute had been properly raised, the proper appeal would have been to the Supreme Court of Florida. See Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 9 cases

View all citing references →
1982: 11985: 11986: 21987: 21989: 11992: 12000: 119822026peak 1986 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Barnett Bank v. Estate of Read493 So. 2d 447 (Fla. 1986)
  2. May v. Illinois Nat. Ins. Co.771 So. 2d 1143 (Fla. 2000)
  3. Jones v. Sun Bank/Miami, NA609 So. 2d 98 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
  4. Rubin v. Glick419 So. 2d 817 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
  5. In re Estate of Read472 So. 2d 1271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985) · Dissent
  6. Campbell v. Estate of Schleusener504 So. 2d 417 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Most recent

  1. May v. Illinois Nat. Ins. Co.771 So. 2d 1143 (Fla. 2000)
  2. Jones v. Sun Bank/Miami, NA609 So. 2d 98 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
  3. Verde Capital Corp. v. Gutierrez548 So. 2d 698 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
  4. Velzy v. Estate of Miller502 So. 2d 1295 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
  5. Campbell v. Estate of Schleusener504 So. 2d 417 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
  6. Barnett Bank v. Estate of Read493 So. 2d 447 (Fla. 1986)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Sanford v. Rubin, 237 So. 2d 134 (Fla. 1970) 183
Davis v. Evans, 132 So. 2d 476 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961) 53

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list