TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Blanche

UNITED STATES of America, PlaintiffCounter Defendant-Appellee, v. Andrew E. BLANCHE, Et Al., Defendants, Andrew E. Blanche; Cynthia D. Blanche, Defendants-Cross Claimants-Counter Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. William S. Hewitt, Defendant-Cross Defendant-Appellee

United States v. Blanche, 169 F.3d 956 (5th Cir. 1999)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 12, 1999
Docket
No. 97-50482
Judges
Demoss, Parker, Dennis
Citations
169 F.3d 9561999 WL 133473

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

This appeal raises for our determination the validity of the district court’s determination that the United States, through the Internal Revenue Service, had a tax lien against the following described property:

Lot Number One (1), Block Number One (1), NORTHCLIFF COUNTRY CLUB *957 ESTATES COMMUNITY, SECTION 1, a subdivision in Guadalupe County, Texas, according to plat recorded in Volume 4, Pages 63-65, Plat Records, Guadalupe County, Texas.

The district court determined that such tax lien was valid in the amount of $25,276.20 and ordered the foreclosure of such tax lien and the distribution of the proceeds from the sale of the property as described in the final Judgment of the district court filed on February 28,1997.

This Court has now been advised that during the pendency of this appeal, the Federal National Mortgage Association as holder of the first mortgage note on the above described property has exercised its power of sale under the deed of trust securing such note; and the substitute trustee under the first deed of trust has sold such property to third parties at a foreclosure sale on December 1,1998.

No party to this appeal has raised any issue as to the validity of the first mortgage lien; and the foreclosure of such lien effectively moots the issues of this appeal.

Accordingly, we DISMISS this appeal as moot.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1999: 12001: 119992026peak 1999 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Christopher Village, Ltd. Partnership v. Retsinas190 F.3d 310 (5th Cir. 1999)
  2. Blanche v. Commissioner2001 T.C. Memo. 63

Most recent

  1. Blanche v. Commissioner2001 T.C. Memo. 63
  2. Christopher Village, Ltd. Partnership v. Retsinas190 F.3d 310 (5th Cir. 1999)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list