Robbins v. State
Opinion
564 So.2d 256 (1990)
John Anderson ROBBINS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida and Richard Dugger, Appellees.
No. 89-2554.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
July 23, 1990.
*257 John Anderson Robbins, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Bradley R. Bischoff, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Habeas corpus is not a vehicle for obtaining additional appeals on issues which were raised or should have been raised on appeal or could have been challenged pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850; White v. Duggar, 511 So.2d 554 (Fla. 1987). The issues raised by appellant were adequately addressed by this court in Robbins v. State, 370 So.2d 420 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). Defendant is procedurally barred from seeking further relief by failing to meet the time constraints enumerated in Rule 3.850, Fla.R.Crim.P.
Appellees request for certification is denied.
Affirmed.
WIGGINTON, BARFIELD and WOLF, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 7 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.