TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Fundora

State v. Fundora, 513 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 1987)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Florida · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 24, 1987
Docket
No. 70150
Judges
Ehrlich
Citations
513 So. 2d 12212 Fla. L. Weekly 499

Opinion

513 So.2d 122 (1987)

STATE of Florida, Petitioner,

v.

Gerardo FUNDORA, Respondent.

No. 70150.

Supreme Court of Florida.

September 24, 1987.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Richard L. Polin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for petitioner.

Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, for respondent.

EHRLICH, Justice.

We have for review Fundora v. State, 508 So.2d 1250 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), because of conflict with our recent decision in State v. Ginebra, 511 So.2d 960 (Fla. 1987). We have jurisdiction, article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, and quash the decision below.

Relying on its decisions in Ginebra v. State, 498 So.2d 467 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), and Edwards v. State, 393 So.2d 597 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), the district court below reversed the trial court's summary denial of Fundora's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion, finding that "1) appellant's contentions, that his counsel was ineffective in failing to inform Fundora of the possibility of deportation as a result of his guilty plea and that his pleas were made involuntary as a result of this lack of information, are valid grounds for collateral relief from his guilty pleas ... and 2) appellant sufficiently alleges facts which, if proven, would support his prayer for relief." 508 So.2d at 1250 (citations omitted). In State v. Ginebra , we recently quashed the third district's decision in that case and expressly disapproved its reasoning in Edwards , holding that "counsel's failure to advise his client of the collateral consequence of deportation does not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel." 511 So.2d at 962 .

The trial court's summary denial of Fundora's 3.850 motion was proper under our holding in Ginebra. Accordingly, we quash the decision below and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

McDONALD, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, BARKETT and GRIMES, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1987: 11988: 11991: 31992: 219872026peak 1991 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Marriott v. State605 So. 2d 985 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
  2. Dugart v. State578 So. 2d 789 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
  3. Marriott v. State582 So. 2d 728 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
  4. Heuring v. State513 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 1987)
  5. Bermudez v. State603 So. 2d 657 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
  6. State v. Vera766 P.2d 110 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1988)

Most recent

  1. Marriott v. State605 So. 2d 985 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
  2. Bermudez v. State603 So. 2d 657 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
  3. Lemus v. State585 So. 2d 388 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
  4. Marriott v. State582 So. 2d 728 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
  5. Dugart v. State578 So. 2d 789 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
  6. State v. Vera766 P.2d 110 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 5

DepthCaseCited by
State v. Ginebra, 511 So. 2d 960 (Fla. 1987) 81
Edwards v. State, 393 So. 2d 597 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981) 47
Fundora v. State, 508 So. 2d 1250 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987) 1
Heuring v. State, 513 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 1987) 140
Ginebra v. State, 498 So. 2d 467 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list